Lesson 2: Appeals
Legal Studies 3080
Section 4 - After the Trial
Lesson 2: Appeals
If you have ever listened to media coverage of
criminal cases you will be aware that often at the end of a trial the
reporters will ask the lawyers on the losing side if they intend to
launch an appeal. There are many reasons why either the Crown or the
defence might decide to ask for an appeal after a trial has ended, but
ultimately the reasons all boil down to the same things: either the
accused believes that the conviction was unjust and/or the sentence too
harsh, or the Crown believes that an acquittal was wrong or the sentence
too lenient.
The right of
appeal
was introduced into the Canadian criminal justice
system in 1923. Its purpose is to allow one or more judges to review the
decisions of a trial judge (or a judge and jury) in a lower court.
Either the Crown or the defence can launch an appeal, and they have 30
days to begin this process.
In the case of an indictable offence, the defence or
the Crown can appeal either the sentence or the conviction.
The party applying for the appeal is known as the
appellant, and the other party is called the
respondent. In most appeals - but by no means all - the appellant is the defence and the respondent is the Crown.
During the appeal process, a panel of judges in a
higher court will look at the transcripts of the trial to see if an
error was made - either by allowing inadmissible evidence or simply in
not having enough evidence for a conviction. The lawyers for the
appellant and respondent submit written arguments to the judges setting
out their cases. Both sides may also present oral arguments before the
court; this process allows the
appellate court
to pose questions.
Normally, neither side is permitted to present new
evidence during an appeal process; though "fresh evidence" can be
admitted in some situations. Rather than focusing on evidence, both
sides focus on whether or not an error was made during the trial. This
might be an "error in fact" (such as admitting evidence that should not
have been allowed) or an "error in law" (such as a mistake in the trial
proceeding).
If an appeal is successful, the result might be that the
decision of the trial court is reversed or the appellate court might
order a completely new trial - a trial
trial de novo. It is important to note, however, that an appeal late
court can't reverse an acquittal by a jury; if it disagrees with the
decision, its only course of action is to order a new trial.

Appeals proceed up the ladder of courts that you studied earlier in this course. Ultimately some appeals may go all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada - the highest appellate court in the land. Only appeals concerning serious questions of law end up there.
Normally, the Supreme Court decides whether or not it will hear an appeal from a lower court; it is simply too busy to hear every appeal that comes its way. In some cases, however, it has no choice - for instance, when the panel of judges of a provincial Court of Appeal comes to a split decision.