The Impact of Growth and Case Studies
The Impact of Global Growth and Case Studies
We cover five ways there is impact of growth on the environment. Select each of the tabs listed.

Global warming is the most significant effect of climate change. Global warming is the observed increase in the average temperature of the earth's atmosphere and oceans in recent years. The Earth's average temperature rose about 0.2 to 0.6 degrees Celsius in the 20th century. That does not sound like much change, but the effects are significant, and greater changes are predicted for the future.
Global warming is caused primarily by the greenhouse effect, a process in which the absorption of infrared radiation by the atmosphere warms the planet. The human induced causes of the greenhouse effect include the burning of fossil fuels, clearing land, and agriculture practices that lead to increased amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Global warming also leads to rising sea levels, changes in the amount and pattern of precipitation, and increases in extreme weather, such as droughts, floods, heat waves, hurricanes, and tornadoes. As well, it can lead to higher or lower agricultural production, species extinction, retreat of glaciers, and reduced levels of rivers and streams.
Is our prosperity sustainable if climate change continues?
Can human life as we know it continue if the trends in climate change continue at the current rate?
Natural and overall rates of growth
The natural population growth of a nation is determined by calculating the number of live births minus the number of deaths per year. The overall population growth rate also includes the number of people who migrate into a country in any given year.

You might think that wealthy nations and wealthy families would have the most children, since they can best afford to provide for them. Interestingly enough, the more wealthy industrialized nations have lower population growth rates than developing nations. Canada has an overall growth rate of just over 1%, while some European countries actually have shrinking populations.
Ninety-nine percent of global population growth occurs in the developing world, with several countries on a growth curve that will lead to their populations doubling (Nigeria) or even tripling (Ethiopia) in population by 2050. In these families, women are rarely educated and often have large numbers of children. Choosing to have large families is in part based on cultural values, where large families are important and it is also considered very important to have male children. These are precisely the areas that can least afford the increase in population. They often lack clean water, arable land, infrastructure, and finances to increase food production. Many of these families are very poor, and cannot afford to feed, educate, or provide health care to their children. Infant mortality is often high.
The maps are called cartograms in which the territories are re-sized on each map according to a variable. For instance, countries such as India, China, and Japan appear larger on some maps because they have large populations. On the other hand, Canada, which has a large land mass, is shown relatively small because it has a small population.
Family Planning
The governments of many nations have been concerned with unchecked population growth. While population growth in the developed world tends to lead to economic growth, uncontrolled population growth in the developing world has a negative impact. Governments in these countries fear that there will not be enough food to go around, that the infrastructure cannot support more people, and that the economy will suffer if there are too many mouths to feed. In the past, countries like China have enforced a "One Child Policy" that has forced families to have only one child, while places like India have increased family planning education and access to birth control.
The education of women is a primary reason why many nations have been able to control their population growth. When women have control over reproduction, they tend to have fewer children. When women have higher earning power and greater skills to participate in the economy, they often choose to have fewer children and to ensure their children have the greater advantages. Education as a result empowers women allowing them to make informed decisions about their own lives and those of their children.
Carrying capacity
In your science courses, you may have learned about carrying capacity, or the ability of a particular area to support life. Does the Earth have a carrying capacity for human beings? As human beings, we are unique in our ability to modify our environment and improve technology for food and energy production. Unlike animals, we also do not consume resources based on our essential needs. People in the developed world consume food, water, and energy at far greater rates than people in the developing world. In fact, people in the developed world tend to consume far more resources than they really need to survive. Globalization further complicates our ability to calculate the Earth's carrying capacity, because we do not survive just off the resources in the immediate area where we live; we can use resources that come from all over the world. Improved farming techniques and waste management mean that the Earth can support increasing numbers of people. These unique abilities make an estimation of the human carrying capacity of the planet complex. That being said, most ecologists believe that our current rates of population growth and resource use are not sustainable. If we wanted an Earth on which everyone was able to live like we do in North America, the Earth could only sustain half its current population. On the other hand, if we want to reduce our standard of living and reduce biodiversity, we can sustain a larger population.
This is a major obstacle in defining the actions needed to combat the ill effects of air pollution and to mobilizing local, national, and international resources to combat the problem. The World Health Organization has taken a leading role in education. Serious action must take place, they say, citing findings that estimate that more than two million people per year die from particulate pollution. Air quality standards can be enforced by law. The Clean Air Act in the United States is one form of legislation that protects air quality. One of the largest producers of air pollution is the automobile.
Deforestation is the destruction of forests due to human activities. This can happen through direct cutting of forests, or through pollution such as acid rain. Forests are important because they provide oxygen through photosynthesis. Also, forests are effective filters of air pollution. Trees can filter polluted air, making it clean again. Of course, depending on the type of air pollution, pollution can kill trees. Today, all the major forests of the world are threatened by human activities.

Desertification is the gradual expansion of deserts to include areas that were once fertile. Desertification increases because of deforestation, poor farming techniques, overgrazing, and global warming.
Destruction of ecosystems has an impact on both people and animals. As human activity becomes greater throughout the world, more and more ecosystems are affected, and animals lose more of their natural habitat.



So, why should we be concerned? If there is so much food available, why do so many people starve?
The problem is that food, similar to wealth, is not equally distributed around the world. Although most people in the industrialized world have more than enough food, those in the world's poorest nations still go hungry.


Technology and agricultural yields
As more people take up more land, increased agricultural production becomes increasingly important. Technology has increased the yield per hectare of food products around the world, and nations are becoming more specialized in the production of foodstuffs. Improved seeds for crops, more efficient farm machines, better fertilizers, and better pesticides and herbicides all help the land produce more grains and vegetables. Better feeding and breeding and the introduction of growth hormones and antibiotics have increased production of livestock. Factory farms, where mass production techniques have been used to increase production, are another factor in increasing agricultural yields.
This technology, of course, is not available to all nations equally, and the gap between rich and poor nations widens.
Genetically modified foods
Genetically engineered foods have the genes of other organisms inserted into them to make them stronger or more productive. For example, "Round-up Ready Canola" has been genetically modified to resist the herbicide Round-up, so that when the crop is sprayed, all other plants die and the canola plants live. Genetically modified crops have many potential advantages, because they can produce higher yields. Foods can also be genetically modified to make them more nutritious or healthier. For instance, transgenic rice can improve oral rehydration to counter the effects of diarrhea, which is the second largest infectious killer of children under the age of five in the developing world. Golden rice has had two genes inserted into its genome, providing additional amounts of vitamin A. Vitamin A deficiency is a leading cause of blindness in up to half a million children a year, and a leading cause of disease in children in the developing world. Genetically modified plants are grown in forty countries and include rice, soybeans, corn, and sweet potatoes among others. Each year, more land is being planted with genetically modified plants.


The Swan Hills Treatment Centre is the only licensed high level Poly-chlorinated biphenyl (PCB—a highly toxic fluid used to cool transformers and electric motors) disposal facility in Canada, and so it takes a high volume of Poly-chlorinated biphenyl (PCBs) from eastern Canada. In addition to being Canada's only high level licensed PCB treatment facility, the Swan Hills Treatment Center is Canada's only licensed facility to treat Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)—compounds that are removed from old air conditioning and cooling systems and that harm the environment. Prior to being shipped, waste is tested to determine its chemical make-up. If it is considered acceptable, it is trucked to the center where it is retested and a suitable method of destroying the waste is determined.
Wastes can be destroyed through incineration (burning), or neutralized through a chemical/physical treatment process, or stabilized/solidified before placement in a secure engineered onsite landfill. Residual materials from the initial treatment processes are disposed of in onsite landfill cells or injected 1800 meters below the ground into a stable geological formation far below the groundwater.
Problems with the plant: The plant has not been without problems. In the 1990s, a leak of residual incineration by-products into the air, an explosion at the plant, and the discovery of contaminants in local wildlife led to a call from First Nations groups to close the plant. The 7000 Aboriginal people who hunt and trap in the area rely on wild game and were concerned about the effects of these toxins on their food. Since that time, the First Nations Community has come to accept the plant and is now a supporter of the facility. The First Nations Community in the area now has an Accord with the Swan Hills Treatment Center, and the facility exists in harmony with the community in general. In 2000, Bovar (the company that had been operating the plant) relinquished ownership of the facility to the Alberta Government. In 2003, Earth Tech was awarded a contract to operate and maintain the facility for the Alberta Government for ten years. Suez Canada Waste Services Inc. has made important strides in environmental health and safety, and the facility recently surpassed 1.3 million man hours without a lost-time accident.
With files from Pierre Lavigne, National Sales Representative, SUEZ Canada Waste Services Inc. Swan Hills Treatment Center

The Swan Hills plant shows how toxic waste can be disposed of in the developed world using state-of-the-art technology and strict environmental controls.
Pollution in the developing world is more difficult to hide. Many nations in the developing world are desperate to gain wealth, so governments accept waste that they are unable to process, and the results can be disastrous. People in the developing world often scavenge through garbage dumps to obtain discarded goods for re-use or resale. This exposes them to serious health risks.
Inadequate facilities: Trafigura tried to have the waste processed in the Netherlands, but when the waste appeared to be unusually toxic, the contracted Dutch waste management company raised its prices and forced the company to find another location. They first stopped in Estonia, where they found a company willing to accept the waste for more than they were prepared to pay, and then Nigeria, where they could find no one to process it. A company called Compaigne Tommy in Abidjan agreed to take the waste, but instead of processing it properly, they illegally dumped it in the middle of the night into seventeen landfill sites within the densely populated city. Ivory Coast has no toxic waste disposal facilities. Ten people died of the toxic fumes, twenty-three were hospitalized, and 40 000 were treated at hospitals and clinics for vomiting, diarrhea, nosebleeds, headaches, and respiratory problems. A large number of pigs were also slaughtered for fear they were contaminated with the "toxic slop". The sludge was later found to contain hydrogen sulfide.
Consequences? Immediately after this incident, a number of African officials resigned. The Dutch-based Trafigura, while denying responsibility for the disaster, agreed to pay the Ivorian government US$198 million for cleanup and an inquiry, and to secure the release of three of its employees who had traveled to Abidjan immediately after the incident was reported to help with the cleanup. They were arrested and held for five months.
Think about
Need for balance: These two case studies show that toxic waste can be disposed of adequately. It also raises some questions in our globalizing world. Is there a balance between environmental safety and making money? Should large corporations use the developed world to dispose of their waste when safety standards are rarely adequate? What role do national governments play in ensuring that the environment is protected and that people are safe? How can the global community ensure that the environment is protected?