WR-Assignment 2: Marking Rubric



Interpretation of Sources
(8 marks)
Defence of Position
(8 marks)
Communication
(4 marks)
Excellent
E
  • Interpretations are insightful and comprehensive.
  • Evidence is specific and accurate and errors, if present, do not detract from the response.
  • The student demonstrates a confident and perceptive understanding of applicable social studies knowledge.

8

  • The defence of position is based on one or more convincing, logical arguments.
  • Evidence is specific and accurate and errors, if present, do not detract from the response.
  • The student demonstrates a confident and perceptive understanding of applicable social studies knowledge and the assigned task.

8

  • The writing is fluent and effectively organized.
  • Precise and effective stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of a convincing, engaging voice.
  • Vocabulary is precise and effective.
  • The writing demonstrates confident control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics.
  • Occurrence of error is rare.

4

Proficient
Pf
  • Interpretations are specific and accurate but may not address all sources.
  • Evidence is relevant and appropriate but may contain some minor factual errors.
  • The student demonstrates a clear   understanding of applicable social studies knowledge.

6.4

  • The defence of position is based on one or more sound arguments.
  • Evidence is appropriate, but may contain some factual errors.
  • The student demonstrates a clear  understanding of applicable social studies knowledge and the assigned task.

6.4

  • The writing is clearly organized.
  • Appropriate and frequently effective stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of a distinct voice.
  • Vocabulary is accurate and appropriate.
  • The writing frequently demonstrates effective control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics.
  • Occurrence of error is infrequent.

3.2

Satisfactory
S
  • Interpretations are valid but general and may contain minor misconceptions.
  • Evidence is relevant, but general, may be incompletely developed, and/or contains minor errors.
  • The student demonstrates an acceptable understanding of applicable social studies knowledge.

4.8

  • The defence of position is based on one or more adequate arguments.
  • Evidence is relevant, but general and/or incompletely developed.
  • The evidence may contain errors. Application of social studies knowledge and the assigned task is acceptable.

4.8

  • The writing generally clear and functionally organized.
  • Adequate and basic stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of a voice that is matter of fact.
  • Vocabulary is generally accurate, but not specific.
  • The writing demonstrates basic control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics.
  • Errors do not seriously interfere with communication.

2.4

Limited
L
  • Interpretations are over-generalized and may contain substantial misconceptions.
  • Evidence is superficial, may not always be relevant, and may contain significant errors.
  • Application of social studies knowledge is is discernable but confused or limited.

3.2

  • The defence of position is based on simple assertions and/or questionable logic rather than on supportive arguments.
  • Evidence is superficial and may not always be relevant.
  • The evidence may contain significant errors.
  • Application of social studies knowledge is limited.

3.2

  • The writing is uneven and incomplete but is discernibly organized.
  • Awkward stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of an unconvincing and/or inappropriate voice.
  • Vocabulary is imprecise and/or inappropriate.
  • The writing demonstrates faltering control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics.
  • Errors hinder communication.

1.6

Poor
P
  • Interpretations are mistaken or irrelevant.
  • Evidence, if present, is incomplete and/or marginally relevant and frequently contains significant errors.
  • Application of social studies knowledge is negligible.

1.6

  • The defence of position taken is difficult to determine and/or little or no attempt is made to defend it.
  • Evidence, if present, is incomplete and/or marginally relevant.
  • Significant errors in content are frequent.
  • The student demonstrates a minimal understanding of applicable social studies knowledge and the assigned task.

1.6

  • The writing is unclear and disorganized.
  • Ineffective and/or inappropriate stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of an ineffective and/or unsuitable voice.
  • Vocabulary is ineffective and frequently incorrect.
  • A lack of control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics is demonstrated.
  • Errors impede communication.

0.8