|
Interpretation of Sources
(8 marks)
|
Defence of Position
(8 marks)
|
Communication (4 marks)
|
Excellent E
|
- Interpretations are insightful and comprehensive.
- Evidence is specific and accurate and errors, if present, do not detract from the response.
- The student demonstrates a confident and perceptive understanding of applicable social studies knowledge.
8
|
- The defence of position is based on one or more convincing, logical arguments.
- Evidence is specific and accurate and errors, if present, do not detract from the response.
- The student demonstrates a confident and perceptive understanding of applicable social studies knowledge and the assigned task.
8
|
- The writing is fluent and effectively organized.
- Precise and effective stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of a convincing, engaging voice.
- Vocabulary is precise and effective.
- The writing demonstrates confident control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics.
- Occurrence of error is rare.
4
|
Proficient Pf
|
- Interpretations are specific and accurate but may not address all sources.
- Evidence is relevant and appropriate but may contain some minor factual errors.
- The student demonstrates a clear understanding of applicable social studies knowledge.
6.4
|
- The defence of position is based on one or more sound arguments.
- Evidence is appropriate, but may contain some factual errors.
- The student demonstrates a clear understanding of applicable social studies knowledge and the assigned task.
6.4
|
- The writing is clearly organized.
- Appropriate and frequently effective stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of a distinct voice.
- Vocabulary is accurate and appropriate.
- The writing frequently demonstrates effective control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics.
- Occurrence of error is infrequent.
3.2
|
Satisfactory S
|
-
Interpretations are valid but general and may contain minor misconceptions.
- Evidence is relevant, but general, may be incompletely developed, and/or contains minor errors.
- The student demonstrates an acceptable understanding of applicable social studies knowledge.
4.8
|
- The defence of position is based on one or more adequate arguments.
- Evidence is relevant, but general and/or incompletely developed.
- The evidence may contain errors. Application of social studies knowledge and the assigned task is acceptable.
4.8
|
- The writing generally clear and functionally organized.
- Adequate and basic stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of a voice that is matter of fact.
- Vocabulary is generally accurate, but not specific.
- The writing demonstrates basic control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics.
- Errors do not seriously interfere with communication.
2.4
|
Limited L
|
- Interpretations are over-generalized and may contain substantial misconceptions.
- Evidence is superficial, may not always be relevant, and may contain significant errors.
- Application of social studies knowledge is is discernable but confused or limited.
3.2
|
- The defence of position is based on simple assertions and/or questionable logic rather than on supportive arguments.
- Evidence is superficial and may not always be relevant.
- The evidence may contain significant errors.
- Application of social studies knowledge is limited.
3.2
|
- The writing is uneven and incomplete but is discernibly organized.
- Awkward stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of an unconvincing and/or inappropriate voice.
- Vocabulary is imprecise and/or inappropriate.
- The writing demonstrates faltering control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics.
- Errors hinder communication.
1.6
|
Poor P
|
- Interpretations are mistaken or irrelevant.
- Evidence, if present, is incomplete and/or marginally relevant and frequently contains significant errors.
- Application of social studies knowledge is negligible.
1.6
|
- The defence of position taken is difficult to determine and/or little or no attempt is made to defend it.
- Evidence, if present, is incomplete and/or marginally relevant.
- Significant errors in content are frequent.
- The student demonstrates a minimal understanding of applicable social studies knowledge and the assigned task.
1.6
|
- The writing is unclear and disorganized.
- Ineffective and/or inappropriate stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of an ineffective and/or unsuitable voice.
- Vocabulary is ineffective and frequently incorrect.
- A lack of control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics is demonstrated.
- Errors impede communication.
0.8
|