4.3.3 Liberalism and the Environment



"Whale Trashed" Steve Sack, The Minneapolis Star-Tribune,  MN
How does the cartoonist portray this issue?
Under the principles of liberalism, people are free to compete with each other economically and to act in self- interest. This competition for wealth and power has brought great riches to some and has led to a consumer culture in much of today's world. Consumerism
brings us many new and interesting products, but many people believe that the continuous manufacture and sale of goods for human use comes at a cost to our environment.

 How does environmentalism come into conflict with modern  liberalism?

People who believe in environmentalism believe that the non-stop pursuit of wealth needs to be controlled to protect the natural environment for future generations. They believe that one of the essential rights and freedoms all humans should enjoy under liberalism is the right to a healthy and clean environment.

They support legislation that will regulate greenhouse gas emission, reduce pollution, protect endangered species, support sustainable development, and limit the destruction of the natural world. Those who support environmentalism favour a more collectivist approach in which people take collective responsibility for the future of the planet.

Others are skeptical that human activity is harming the environment. They believe that unregulated capitalism has led to unprecedented wealth and health for almost everyone on the planet today. They believe that competition and free-market capitalism have led to better lives for almost everyone alive today. They believe that legislation to protect the environment limits prosperity for all people because it interferes with the very rights and freedoms that have led to the high standard of living we enjoy today.

Please watch the following video explain environmental economy:

 


 

"Environmental Econ: Crash Course Economics #22", CrashCourse, You-tube

 



Read "Environmentalism" on pages 280 -283 of your text Perspectives on Ideology.


Must complete economic freedom and the ability to act in self-interest be sacrificed to protect the planet for future generations?

Are you prepared to give up any of your freedoms to protect the environment?




Liberalism and Extremism


Challenges to Liberalism: Extremist Perspectives

To be an extremist, one's belief system must lie outside of the normal spectrum of beliefs. Extremism is the belief in actions that are considered unacceptable morally, socially, or politically.

 Here is what happened to one airline passenger in an American airport:


"Air Canada Plane Spotting, Heathrow", Public Domain.
 "There I was, walking in stocking feet with my hands up. I watched the line of people slowly being herded along as armed guards patted us down. I had to take off my sweater so the female guard could pat me down. Then I went into a chamber where powder came out of the walls. I could see the fear in everyone's faces. And to think, I was in the so-called land of the free. We have given up our freedoms in the name of security, but I don't feel very safe right now."

 The attacks on the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001, ignited the War on Terror campaign and led to the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq in 2003 plus a series of foreign policies known as the Bush Doctrine.

Please watch the following video explain remembering 9/11:

 

 

 "Remembering 9/11: A Timeline of Tragic Events", Inside Edition, You-tube

 




Foreign policy under the Bush administration after 2001 emphasized the right of the United States to secure itself aggressively from countries that harboured or gave aid to terrorist groups. This approach is associated with the ideals of international intervention to secure American national interests.

Β© U.S. National Institute of Health President George Bush Jr.
 "We will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime."
β€”George W. Bush in his September 20, 2001, address to the United States Congress

In 2001, as a result of the terrorist challenges to western liberalism, the liberal democracy of the United States passed the Patriot Act, which allowed American authorities to

  • search all communications such as telephone and e-mail conversations

  • records such as medical, financial, and any other records

  • ease restrictions on intelligence gathering in the U.S.

  • increase the powers of law enforcement and immigration authorities in keeping or deporting immigrants for suspected terrorist related acts

In a country that prided itself on civil liberties, under pressure from extremist groups like al-Qaeda, the U.S. Patriot Act did much to limit those freedoms.

Please watch the following video explain patriot act controversy:

 

 

"Here's Why the Patriot Act is So Controversial" History, You-tube 

 



 The Canadian government passed similar legislation in 2001, the Canadian Anti-Terrorism Act.

Please watch the following video explain Canada's anti-terror measures:

 

 

"Canada's anti-terror measures", CBC News: The National, You-tube

 




"Everywhere where power is exercised there needs to be clear limits to its reach, and it is liberals who should be defining them. The war against terror has given governments a new and dangerous rationale for encroaching on civil liberties and limiting personal privacy-often in the name of our own safety. This year the European Parliament was forced to take European governments to the European Court of Justice when they authorized an agreement with the United States to share confidential data on European airline passengers traveling across the Atlantic. As in the United States, many European governments have used the war on terror to fast-track untested biometric technology. If these things make us marginally safer-and there is not a lot of evidence that they do-they do so at a real cost in reduced privacy and liberty.

The war against terror leaves us afraid, and fearful people will listen to governments who tell them they can only be safer when government is more powerful. Benjamin Franklin said that the man who would surrender liberty for a little safety deserves neither. As liberals we need to be on our guard against claims that we can be more secure by being less free."
β€”Graham Watson, Member of European Parliament, 2004

An area of extremism has been the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Taliban is an extremist group that once ruled Afghanistan in a totalitarian manner. After the World Trade Center was destroyed by the extremist group al-Qaeda on 9/11, 2001, the United States removed the Taliban from power by military force. The Taliban had been allowing al-Qaeda and its leader Osama bin Laden to train their extremist forces there. Canada and many other NATO forces supported the United States in pushing out the Taliban. However, the Taliban have been able to mount a brutal campaign against NATO coalition troops.

During 2008, in the Swat Valley of Pakistan, the Taliban shut down schools. Through an agreement with the Pakistani government, the schools for girls did reopen. But there is still immense pressure on girls not to go to school. Girls face serious harassment as well in Afghanistan. In 2008, some girls were attacked with acid, causing serious injury to their faces for attending school. During the Taliban's rule, girls were banned from attending school.



Read "Extremism" on pages 410 - 415 in your textbook Perspectives of Ideologies.

Please watch the following video explain safe & sorry-terrorism & mass surveillance:

 

 

"Safe and Sorry-Terrorism & Mass Surveillance", Kurzgesagt-In a Nutshell, You-tube