Source Interpretation Assignment - Contemporary Globalization
This is your second source interpretation assignment of Social Studies course. You will have 3 sources to examine and respond to. In your response you will have to:
- Interpret each source and demonstrate your understanding of how each source links to contemporary globalization.
- Explain one or more of the relationships that exist among all three sources.
Please click the following link to open the assignment -Â Social Studies Source Interpretation Assignment.Â
Having trouble understanding how to write a source interpretation? Take a look at this Source Interpretation Presentation.Â
Still don't understand? E-mail me your questions.
Here is the rubric you will be marked on for your source interpretation assignment. Please read over to know what is expected of you from this assignment.Â
 |
 |
Interpretation of Sources |
 |
Identification of Relationships |
 |
Quality of Communication** |
           /12 |
Interpretation of sources includes:
 Note: You must address ALLthree sources. |
        /6 |
Identification of Relationships includes:
Note: You may discuss the relationship(s) in one part of the response or throughout the response. |
        /2 |
Quality of Communication includes control of:
 Note: You are expected to use paragraph form. (see side bar for more information) |
|
Excellent  E |
4 4 4 |
Interpretation of the source is sophisticated, insightful, and precise. Linkages to the principles of (globalization, nationalism, liberalism) are accurate, perceptive, and comprehensively developed. |
6 5.5 Â |
Relationship(s) are accurately and perceptively identified. The explanation is thorough and comprehensive |
2 |
Vocabulary is precise and deliberately chosen. Sentence structure is controlled and sophisticated; ideas are judiciously organized. The writing demonstrates skillful control of mechanics and grammar. |
Proficient  Pf |
3 3 3 |
Interpretation of the source is sound, specific, and adept. Linkages to the principles of (globalization, nationalism, or liberalism) are consistent, logical, and capably developed. |
5 4.5 |
Relationship(s) are clearly and capably identified. The explanation is appropriate and purposeful. |
1.5 |
Vocabulary is appropriate and specific. Sentence structure is controlled and effective; ideas are purposefully organized. The writing demonstrates capable control of mechanics and grammar. |
Satisfactory  S |
2 2 2 |
Interpretation of the source is adequate, straightforward, and conventional. Linkages to the principles of (globalization, nationalism, or liberalism) are relevant and developed in a generalized fashion. |
4 3.5 3 |
Relationship(s) are generally and adequately identified. The explanation is straightforward and conventional. |
1 |
Vocabulary is conventional and generalized. Sentence structure is controlled and straightforward; ideas are adequately organized. The writing demonstrates basic control of mechanics and grammar. |
Limited  L |
1 1 1 |
Interpretation of the source is confused, vague and/or simplistic. Linkages established to the principles of (globalization, nationalism, or liberalism) may be incomplete, superficial,& imprecise. |
2.5 2 |
The identification of relationship(s) is superficial and of questionable accuracy. The explanation is confusing, overgeneralized and redundant. |
0.5 |
Vocabulary is imprecise, simplistic, and/or inappropriate. Sentence structure is awkward; ideas are ineffectively organized. The writing demonstrates a faltering control of mechanics and grammar. |
Poor  P |
0.5 0.5 0.5 |
Interpretation of the source is minimal, inaccurate and/or copied from the source. Linkages to the principals of (globalization, nationalism, or liberalism) are disjointed, irrelevant, and demonstrate little/no understanding of the assigned task. |
1.5 1 |
The identification of relationship(s) is minimal. The explanation is off topic and undeveloped. |
0.4 0.2 |
Vocabulary is overgeneralized and/or inaccurate. Sentence structure is uncontrolled; organization of ideas is confused and/or lacking. The writing demonstrates a large lack of control of mechanics and grammar. |
Insufficient INS |
 |
Does not attempt to address the assignment or is too brief to assess in any scoring category. |